Vadim Finkelstein: Brock Lesnar is only a product of UFC�s PR

Vadim Finkelstein: Brock Lesnar is only a product of the UFC's PR | Steve rattlesnake MMA

You have the fight observed Brock Lesnar and Cain Velasquez? if so, what are your impressions?

Vadim Finkelstein: I have long said that Lesnar more from a product of UFC?s PR instead of a heavy fighter and this fight clearly confirmed it is

And how would you rate Velasquez?

I think he is a very good fighter and in his skills and stärken.UFC best in the world presents him now as that and it's certainly debatable, but he is a real fighter, not a product of PR.

And what about the rumors that you negotiate with the UFC?

It?s stupidity.We are not such negotiations lead.

Now we are in active negotiations with Showtime on a contract extension, and perhaps we'll erneuern.Aber it the UFC offers no such possibilities and its monopoly conditions imposed.They believe that everyone in the UFC should be.We would, look forward with Lesnar, but why we should give up Velasquez and all to fight all of these companies, all these years spent on Fedor?s is going development to you?Grow Fedor in the UFC, right?Why should he go to the UFC? if Dana White wants to fight, can he keep it easy, because we nothing dagegen.Und while the contract with Showtime gives us more possibilities.

Fedor is now ready to Kämpfen.Er 34, he feels well and is ready to arbeiten.Er is ready to sign a contract for five or six battles, and run the task very gut.Er says always He?s ready to handeln.Wir need to protect our interests.

Should we expect to fight Fedor in Japan on New Year?s Eve?

We discussed this possibility with the Japanese were happy, but had more difficulty and with an interesting opponent for Fedor and many andere.Infolgedessen negotiations have not even happens, since there was no concrete Vorschlag.Daher is there in the very near future have to wait until the conclusion of negotiations with Showtime and then clearly when and with whom Fedor will continue to fight.

View the original article here

Matt Hughes laughs at Joe Rogan

Matt Hughes laughs at Joe Rogan | Steve rattlesnake

?Jake shields was interesting for me. Jake ran out of gas, but still the split decision ended. Technically Kampmann had a terrible fight, in my opinion, he gave battle shields. One thing I will say is Joe Rogan?s comment a little off during combat was. The ground game was pretty even in my book with shields to do a bit more control. Kampmann escaped several times at his feet and Kampmann had more submission attempts as shields had but hear Rogan shield, which had submitted to it in the first ten seconds of being on the ground you thought.I really think that the UFC could use a third man, the transfer which has some experience inside the Octagon to tun.Ich Don?t disagree with everything Rogan says, but there are a lot of things he says that I only at. ? laugh

View the original article here

Biggest loss for your favorite MMA fighter?

The server was unable to process the request due to an internal error. For more information about the error, either turn on IncludeExceptionDetailInFaults (either from ServiceBehaviorAttribute or from the configuration behavior on the server in order to send the exception information back to the client, or turn on tracing documentation as per the Microsoft .NET Framework 3.0 SDK and inspect the server trace logs.

What's the biggest, most painful loss that your favorite MMA fighter has endured?

-Scout

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread.(0 members and 1 guests)

By Scout200 in forum mixed martial arts (MMA) & BJJ Forum replies: 0 last post: 10-06-2010, 09: 09 am IM by akio123 in forum mixed martial arts (MMA) & BJJ Forum replies: 24 last post: 10-20-2006, 05: 57 PM by crazyjoe380 in forum mixed martial arts (MMA) & BJJ Forum replies: 19 last post: 10-18-2002, 03: 37 am IM by BRI Thai forum mixed martial arts (MMA) & BJJ Forum replies: 5 last post: 08-03-2002, 11: 04 am IM by hookah smokin' Caterpillar in forum mixed martial arts (MMA) & BJJ Forum replies: 14 last post: 11-06-2000, 07: 50 PM you may not post new threadsYou may not post repliesYou may not post attachmentsYou may not edit your postsForum rules

View the original article here